Today's Poor Judgment Award ("The Pudgy") goes to the editorial board at The New Yorker for allowing this (links to Huffington Post article) cover to run unedited.
The cartoon, titled The Politics of Fear, is meant to be satirical: it is satirical. It satirizes the fear-mongering that politicos use to sully Barack Obama's character. It's a representation of what Obama's opponents want you to think so that you will vote for the other guy (or gal). Although it's provocative, Barry Blitt's (the artist) intention is obviously to point out the absurdities of branding the Obamas as unpatriotic (even in some cases implying that they have links to terrorism). The satire is obvious and it raises very good point. There's only one problem.
Understanding this picture is almost entirely contingent upon knowing its title. If this illustration was untitled, it would certainly be presumptuous, offensive and libelous. The title is part of the satirical nature of the illustration. Looking at pictures of the cover, though, no title is present. Oops.
Many people will ask why The New Yorker ran this cover, but that's not the right question. They should be questioning why they printed it without a title. The people at The New Yorker are not stupid; they hit the nail right on the head as far as satire goes. The satire is valid and relevant. Now, though, because of the way they decided to publish it, they allow (and compel) people to misinterpret the illustration in whatever manner they are prone to.
Way to go editors of The New Yorker. This could have been avoided with a cover line. I don't blame them for publishing a provocative political illustration because that's what they do. They are guilty of bad judgment, though, for omitting a cover line.
Yahoo's 100 Movies You Should See Before You Die
-
Is this list like the video tape in *The Ring*?
I almost feel like if I finish reading it and I've seen all of the movies
on it, I'm going to get a call f...
15 years ago
2 comments:
I agree. Couldn't believe it when I saw it this morning on the Today show ... even without Matt Lauer's glib commentary.
I've had no luck in the getting excited about this election department. Help me.
I long to live in a world in which a title wouldn't have to be run with that picture. Certainly I got it immediately, but I also knew that slews of ignoramuses still consider the caricatures of the Obamas valid.
Only in the mind of a braindead right winger would a radical muslim team up with a radical feminist black militant. I mean seriously, how much sense does that make? God save this nation from binary thought.
Either way, we live in the real world and the New Yorker should bloody well have known better. In order to make the parody work, the cartoonist would have to take it further, make it more explicitly satirical. For instance, have Obama holding a teacup with "Tea Drinking Elitist" on it. Show Obama in every false guise the right throws on him to highlight the ridiculousness of it. As is, this cover just doesn't work for today's America without a title.
Post a Comment